Printable View
You mean it's not!! ...I have a lot of people to apolgise too...
IRT if Halo 2 came out on GC: I would buy the game, but buy an Xbox out of spite. For some reason...
What if, to combat over population, it became illegal to have sex with members of the opposite gender?
The song purple rain would have been called "Banana rain"?
What if all our dirtiest, and deepest desires became true? [img]biggrin.gif[/img]
<font size="2" face="Verdana,sans-serif">Oooh.. that would ne messy, wouldn't it?Quote:
Originally posted by Melfice:
What if all our dirtiest, and deepest desires became true? [img]biggrin.gif[/img]
What if Video game characters were real people and they'd be your neighbors and girlfriends and poker buddies and it would own!
IRT CBA: What if noone posted anymore....ever.?
I would be a sad mod
IRT OCB: What if, to combat over population, it became illegal to have sex with members of the opposite gender?
The world would be... I don't know, just ghey [img]smile.gif[/img]
As for myself, I'd abandon my current personality and become some kind of rebel scum just to have sex with girls which is illegal [img]smile.gif[/img]
IRT OCB: What if you wore a chicken suit and rolled eggs around for a living?
I wouldn't have too much time for games [img]frown.gif[/img]
IRT CBA: What if Video game characters were real people and they'd be your neighbors and girlfriends and poker buddies and it would own!
One of the best what-ifs... Shion would be my girlfriend, fiancee and then wife! I would be friends with Ryudo and the other two (which would live together, of course), Fei, Elly, Citan, etc., and I'd start a software company with my wife and Citan. I'd make sure to not play Poker with that Suikoden 3 guy though [img]smile.gif[/img] .
New what-if:
What if all real life girls would be as hot as Shion Uzuki?
what if xellos ever managed to get laid...actully, what if he even managed to get a girlfriend?
Uh oh... Bloody wars started for stuff like this...
What if your_king ever realized the truth and stop trolling?
...i'll have a lot of people to apolgise to...
What if you wore a chicken suit and rolled eggs around for a living?
He he he he... He knows little 'bout you isn`t it Xell?..
I'd join that rebel force Wiseman! rebels against the "non sex with the oposite gender" movement! ^o^
IRT Wiseman-Shion is the girl with the glasses, right?
IRT Yourking-You are looking for trouble...
IRT Melfice: Cool! We need a commercial name... how about "Teh Sex0r Movement"?
WRT overpopulation: If it were a problem, the UN should force poor countries where babies die of hunger to vasectomize stupid people who fuck carelessly and non-stop even though they don't have money nor brains and their babies will die of hunger and stupid parents. The UN should do it starting today, there's the world is overpopulated already.
IRT CBA: Yup, Shion is one of the hottest videogame girls ever, the one with the cute face and glasses. Best. Ass. Ever. Especially if played in a widescreen TV. Plus she's a programmer, this fact further turns me on. LOL.
Ja, I like the whole french resistance type girl, y'know the dangerous girl riding the motorcycle through the countryside and you are getting chased by the corrupt police and she pulls over to you and says hop on, and you do and she takes you to her hideout and then you hit it off and go on rebel missions and have cool rebellios sex and all. I'm such a goof..
Policies in rich countries are 90%-95% clean though
I like innocent shy girls, or the really outgoing girls.
I like Nazi Lolis.
What... the... fuck!?
What?
That was... unusual [img]smile.gif[/img]
????
I like either innocent shy girls like Aoi/Ai Yori Aoshi or bold, outgoing girls like Millenia/Grandia 2; I also like mid-terms like Elly/Xenogears. It's not that I don't care whether she's shy or outgoing, it's that I came to appreciate both ways and both have advantages and disadvantages. For example, I feel all protective towards shy girls and they are so cute, and outgoing girls are can be very fun and sincere. Shion/Xenosaga is pretty innocent (or pretends to be), but she's not shy, and I like the fact that she's a programmer AND hot [img]smile.gif[/img] . I value intelligence very much. I also value sincerity, that's something I like from KOS-MOS; if she thinks somebody sucks, she'll just show him/her that "YOU SUCK!" board pic. Sincerity avoids misunderstandings and uncomfortable situations. I don't mind her being cold-hearted with some things as long as she's not with myself. On the physical department, I don't seek what the average guy seeks, i.e. an anorexic blonde with huge boobs; I like healthy girls that weight what a healty person needs to weight (i.e. not fat, not thin either), and I don't care for hair color or breast size. I do care for asses, I like 'em big and round ^_^'. It's my fetish, can't help it >_>; . LOL. Of course, saying "I like" something doesn't mean it necessarily needs to be so or I don't like the opposite, it's just a general preference, and I came to appreciate different things in different people.
????
Do you notice this thread has gone wildly offtopic? LOL
What if everyone loved Nazi Lolis?
Edit: This was IRT OCB
LOL, this is somewhat bizarre...
I guess joining the nazi party would be the fashion among young girls...
<font color="#101010" size="1">[ April 02, 2004 07:57 AM: Message edited by: -Wiseman- ]</font>
Weird pic... Well drawn though..
Ja, I don't care for the skeleton thin girls either.
Hell, even sort of bigger girls are cool with me too. Intelligence is KEY with me. They've also got to be a freethinker and not let anyone else tell them what to do. Her personality should be really serious and efficient at times and silly and goofy at other times. I don't care for the whiny weak type. Like I said, beret wearing type girls are cool. I guess the goth girls are cool, the music is bad though. yuck.. Hmm, don't care for the uber hyper cheerleader type girl. The artsy/singer songwriter/musician/artist girl is cool with me. The computer nerd girl is ideal for me I think too. I'm not into cybersex though.. I guess I'll post more on this later.
I guess it would... I couldn't see myself dating a nazi girl... Even without the killing of innocent people and all, just the ideaa of fascism.. What would nazi girls be like to date? Any ideas guys?
i love shy girls like tessa from FMP and funny girls like Lime from SMJ .......... i like alotta girls..... basically ..... muwahahahaha
Nazis are fascists but not all fascists are nazis BTW...
I wouldn't have a problem dating or marrying a fascist girl as long as she's not racist; fascism is a political movement I respect if done without racism, genocide, or other bad things, and it respects private property and family values.
????
New what-if: What if, instead of Coca-Cola machines, we had STFU machines all around to give away nice, warm cups of STFU to everybody in need of them?
Cav doesn't like real girls though [img]tongue.gif[/img]
IRT Miguel: That'd be so awesome! *Stupid girl in class is talking too much and getting everyone else in trouble* Hey, Erin, how about a nice cup of shut the fuck up? XD
But fascists aren't for free expression or anything, they just want whats good for the whole?
I don't know much about fascism. Hmmm.. would fascism allow dating and all? OR would they force you into family units and stuff..??
But fascists aren't for free expression or anything, they just want whats good for the whole?
Well, free expression is not necessarily the main or best goal in life. There are fascists of all kinds; the only thing they all have in common is the liking of authoritarian, centralized control (usually in the form of a dictatorship). Some of them are racist, and those following the nazi German party are the nazis, a particular case of fascists. Others can be pretty good persons which, as you said, seek good for the whole and think such government could be a way to achieve it.
Fascism would of course allow dating; I don't think even communists would regulate that. Most of them share traditional values and want our current modern life, only more regulated. Most models proposed by fascists are a dictatorship with a regular right-wing society (i.e. nothing insane) and a protected, restrictive economy (thus not capitalist). They don't decide where you should live, what should you wear, or where you study and work, like communists do. They do control expression to a varying degree and usually disallow opposition.
I personally share some of these ideas, but not all. My ideal would be a Constitutional Monarchy with the Royal Family and a democratic government (with a few particularities to avoid its current problems) sharing power 50/50, a right-wing society, a free economy (capitalism), efficient centralism, and an agnostic state which doesn't want to force religion on non-religious people or waste money on it.
Well, I can see where you are coming from, Wiseman, but I have to say I like communism a lot more. Since communism hasn't really been done right yet, it makes it look bad. Such places as the former USSR, North Korea, China, etc. make communism into something that it is not. The true meaning of Marxism Communism (The true communism) is a classless society with no exploitation. No state machine used by one section of the population to oppress another section. No need for professional armies or police forces. No use of production for profit or exchange. Society runs in accord with the principle: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.
So basically it is the shrinking of the state. But it should not be confused with anarchy, anarchy is for 12 year olds on AOL.
Like I said, most people just see it as another word for dictatorship, when really it is quite different from that.
Communism has been attempted so many times, and it was always a failure. The only country that is somewhat developing while being communist is China, and that's because the only communist thing China has is the name, they dumped it years ago, but didn't want to admit. Also, I wouldn't call it an utopy, an utopy is supposed to be an unreachable heaven, and it doesn't look like it at all to me; not having private property, being equal to everybody, having no rights to be an independent individual, and being an ant. What the State should guarantee is equal opportunities, not equal beings, otherwise the imbeciles, slackers, and corrupts, will get the same resources as the smartest, hard-working, honest ones. Besides, it's impossible to have a state without security forces; other countries have armies and would gladly take over it if it was important but didn't have some military power, and police forces are necessary because some people will always try to do nasty things. I also hate the idea of the State owning everything I work (hard) for, the only thing I find acceptable is that the King and Queen own the land and lease it to citizens, but the citizens' things are the citizens' things, not somebody else's. And why does the State have to determine MY needs? I'm an individual, not an ant, I have different needs than other people ?for example, I don't need a car right now, but I need 2 computers for my experiments (which under communism I wouldn't be allowed to carry on)?, I know better than a bunch of bureaucrats what I need, and how I like it, and I should get it or not according to my work and the value of it for the society, and the best way to quantize and regulate this is currency.
I did differentiate between communism and fascism, though some regimes are both. Personally, if I had to choose, I'd go for fascism without thinking much ? at least I would still be a individual under the second, not a State resource "worker".
Communism sounds ok on paper, but in real life, it never can work, mainly because of the human need for control and power. <font size="1">Will to power...</font>
And I'd really hate to be told where to live, and what job I'll have. (Or is that just China, and not Communism in general?)
hey... i like a few real girls around here lolz .... mmmm big latin booty XD~~~ lmao .... oh wait ur talking about communism! d'oh
IRT Xel: Most communist regimes have tended to regulate everything from your home to the number of farts you're assigned to have a day.
You realise that Nietzsche was just some depressed bloke from ages ago? It's like what he says is true. If it was, then everyone would be walking around rubbing their hands and plotting evil schemes.
Marxism? Nice idea, doesn't work. Need middle ground. Thats the super basics.
If it was, then everyone would be walking around rubbing their hands and plotting evil schemes.
LOL, that's how things are. The real world leaders act like this, and if you don't want to get screwed, you better start thinking of some cunning plan as well [img]wink.gif[/img]
Marxism is not a nice idea at all to me; the "social classes" fighting stupidly is 2 centuries outdated, and just thinking of everybody being "equal" makes me shudder. We're individuals, not ants. We are to be winners and losers, depending on how we do.
<font color="#101010" size="1">[ April 04, 2004 05:30 PM: Message edited by: -Wiseman- ]</font>
You clearly don't understand what this terrorism is about then. The west, rich, has everything, all the food it needs. The rest of the world, poor, has little food and problem after problem.
This is just like the social classes in Britain, America, Spain, etc, from years ago. While it's all good that they are gone in single countries, inequalities across the world are massive. WE are the upper class. THEY are the working/lower class.
If you remember in history, the working classes revolted, and destroyed the upper classes. If we keep using force to beat them down, society will be destroyed, like our past upper classes.
These working classes ain't rational, they are desperate. When their main thoughts are, 'where is some food and water' and 'damn it's hot', when they look to the west, they will think, 'why can't they help us'? They will find religion as a possible aid, learn extremist ideas, and start to fight against us.
Plus, with news of terrorist attacks so common these days, more and more of these extremists will see success in terrorism and start killing more.
the "social classes" fighting stupidly is 2 centuries outdated
This is far from true, it's right in your face, you saw it this weekend. The "class" wars are not dead, but are now at a bigger scale than ever.
Equality is world peace. Everyone needs everything. Otherwise, we have this world.
The west, rich, has everything, all the food it needs. The rest of the world, poor, has little food and problem after problem.
Hah, like that had anything to do with this. For starters, the muslim countries aren't the poorest of the world. The poorest countries are in Africa, and they don't come here to kill our people. Second, if they don't have civilization, it's their fault. Everybody had a chance to be grand, take over his neighbors when they were weak, and evolve. They didn't. Bad for them. It's not like we're stealing their food, in fact, the few money they have is thanks to us and how much do we value oil because of a few bastards who don't want to use better technologies that are already available. And they have equal opportunities when it comes to trade and world alliances; you can see ex-communist countries joining the NATO, or previously underdeveloped countries like China getting business and development all of a sudden because we realize they are capable. This is not a problem of "the rich" and "the poor", that's for fairy tales.
inequalities across the world are massive
There's indeed a big leap between the civilized world and the rest. But it's their choice. I'm well informed of the situation in some of the poorest countries of the world because I have information from insiders. Let's take, for example, Equatorial Guinea. I know somebody who goes there 15 days a year to work as a vehicle mechanic. He makes teh money there, and is grteeted by the country authorities like he were a nation president. The reason: there's only one person in that entire country that knows how to fix stuff well, and that's him. In his trips, he learnt their underdevelopment problem is not related to money. They have a beautiful natural resources (although you can't really see much of it because they never cared for tourism); the problem is the people themselves. They make like $100 a month. It's lame. You could be making that per day in Europe. But it's still some money there. But what do you think they do with their $100? Buy alcohol and get drunk until they run out of money. A couple days after they'll go back to work since they are dirt poor again. In fact, ministers of the country told him it's better they don't earn much, otherwise they'll die of too much alcohol. So, how do they survive? Well, they have such a wonderful country, there's food everywhere! You just stop your car randomly, walk 2 steps, and here you have the nicest apples you've ever seen. And boy, if they collected them and sold them here, we'd gladly buy them, but they never wanted that much work. Heh, if we had such resources here in Europe, we would be swimming in gold! People I know reported the same of Bolivia and several other countries. Another example: Uganda(sp?). ASS RICH country. Oil and diamonds. How come people is dirt poor? Well, the diamond guys sell them to us and use all the money to fight against the oil guys, who sell it to us and use all the money to fight back. WTF, they are retards; can't they see they're wasting their outstanding natural resources nobody else has on a moronic tribal war? And they're letting us get all their good stuff. That's not smart. That's as if Spain decided to sell their beaches to other countries. Some decades ago Germany tried to buy one of our isles. Told them it was a nice joke, but have a free cup of STFU. Now we're making teh money off it.
So I'm fairly certain if they are that poor it's their own problem, probably a matter of lack of maturity and/or intelligence. Also remember how European countries (like Spain) were so fucked up because of wars some 50-70 years ago, to the point the state had to assign everybody's food because there wasn't enough. In just the last 25-30 years, they went from being poor countries to the world's top-10. How did we make it from being a poor country to the 8th world power? Working hard, and being smart. That's all it takes. Every country could do it.
When their main thoughts are, 'where is some food and water' and 'damn it's hot', when they look to the west, they will think, 'why can't they help us'?
We're not giving our nice stuff for free. Why can't they help themselves? It's not like we use some sort of magical device to make money. They could make it as well.
This is far from true, it's right in your face, you saw it this weekend.
That's not a social class, that's terorrist scum. And even if they were so, if social classes disappeared in our countries and we didn't go through communism for it, why can't we expect the same to happen on a world-wide scope?
Equality is world peace. Everyone needs everything. Otherwise, we have this world.
It's not fair to give away nice stuff we worked hard for. In fact, if we're to talk about who has the most resources of the world, the underdeveloped countries should be sharing their stuff with our poor countries who don't have oil, don't have diamonds, don't have free food, and are usually cold as hell.
Equality is unfair. Everybody should have what he or she deserves based on his or her hard work, intelligence, and skill. What we should guarantee is equal opportunities, which is what makes things fair. This is how it works for us, and this is how it would work in the world.
It's they're fault they're poor? Because they are lazy and waste their money on alcohol?
Mundo Deja Vu here! If i remember rightly, that tended to be the same attitude of the upper classes in the past.
Anyway, i'm sure they buy the things they need, but there is little that they could want to buy. They must be living fine, they just don't own massive enterainment systems like we do.
Any country can make themselves rich again, like you said. However, you do get problems like lack of rain, lack of health care, lack of education. Problems like that can cripple countries.
Finally, i'm not saying, give the middle east everything we have, we should help them develop what we have.
Individuality may be good for the individual, but think what we could create all together. Equality could lead to some real incredible creations.
All your arrogant, selfishness may cause you problems. You say that rich, undeveloped countries should share their resources. Thats pushing our countries' responiblities onto someone else. Jeeze, no wonder the world is so fucked at the mo.
It's they're fault they're poor? Because they are lazy and waste their money on alcohol?
Of course. They had same or better opportunities than ourselves. They waste their resources on stupid tribal wars, which is much worse than alcohol. They do a lot of stupid things like sacrifying an animal they could use to some idiot spirits. Think about this: why did Europe colonize Africa? Why didn't Africa colonize us first? Why did Europe NOT colonize China though? Some knew how to develop, some others didn't.
Any country can make themselves rich again, like you said. However, you do get problems like lack of rain, lack of health care, lack of education. Problems like that can cripple countries.
We haven't had droughts since 1992. But even in that year, we made it to increase our GDP. Rich countries aren't too dependant on it. Our health service is free, and it's one of the most advanced in the world; in fact it's one of our strong points, and it's the reason why many people come here from other countries for special, experimental techniques we're pioneering. Education is free as well, including university careers, which doesn't happen in every country. It does suck, but as far as I can see, it's a generalized problem of countries, and ours isn't particularly bad at it, compared to our European neighbors. Spain's main problems are low R&D investment and low GDP per capita (and we're making large improvements in the second though). We also have internal politics problems related to regionalism.
Individuality may be good for the individual, but think what we could create all together. Equality could lead to some real incredible creations.
We're not worker bees. We're people with individual thinking. Sure, when the world had thousands of slaves (equal people, equal in slavery they were), they built pyramids and great Chinese walls. But now we know better than that. We respect the rights of individuals and everybody's right to think and to live true to oneself under our laws. And humanity's greatest creations and discoveries ever came in this individualist era. I doubt a million worker bees would ever be able to discover the secrets behind our DNA.
All your arrogant, selfishness may cause you problems.
I could be arrogant, but I'm honest as well (otherwise I wouldn't admit being arrogant). But this doesn't mean I'm not fair. I judge countries for their actions, and I'm respectful of those who have earnt my respect and admiration. I'm well aware of my and my country's areas that need improvement as well, and try my best to remedy them. Just think about this: why I respect, for example, Poland, and don't respect, for example, Morocco? At first they were just names to me. I learnt of them during my life, and developed respect for the first and not for the second. Why would this be? I sure didn't do this on purpose, because I didn't the name "Morocco" as much.
In any case, keep in mind that this is just country-wide politics. I honestly thing I'm not nearly this arrogant on a personal basis, most of the time.
You say that rich, undeveloped countries should share their resources.
I don't want this at all. I used it as an example to show you how absurd is to talk about giving stuff away.
Um, yes, I've read what I posted and it sounds like I really want this. I'd like to clarify, I do not. It's the right thing for them to take advantage of the stuff they have, and I'd never demand any country to give away stuff for the western countries, same as I don't want the western countries to give away stuff for the rest. We should instead trade each other's good stuff and develop together. Will the poor countries ever follow us and use the stuff we pay them with to develop like us, instead of doing stupid wars or wasting it?
"I could be arrogant, but I'm honest as well (otherwise I wouldn't admit being arrogant). But this doesn't mean I'm not fair. I judge countries for their actions, and I'm respectful of those who have earnt my respect and admiration. I'm well aware of my and my country's areas that need improvement as well, and try my best to remedy them. Just think about this: why I respect, for example, Poland, and don't respect, for example, Morocco? At first they were just names to me. I learnt of them during my life, and developed respect for the first and not for the second. Why would this be? I sure didn't do this on purpose, because I didn't the name "Morocco" as much.
In any case, keep in mind that this is just country-wide politics. I honestly thing I'm not nearly this arrogant on a personal basis, most of the time."
Not everyone is like you though. You see, some people are arrogant, just because they think it makes them look tough or something, and yet they have some deep emotional problem like low self esteem. People working as a team can accomplish all kinds of things, just look at WW2, countries working as a whole, a team, to over come. Look at many businesses, people working as a team to profit and in most cases better the world. As a team, people have different tasks and yet they work and help reach a common goal. Take video game developers for example. If you get an arrogant music guy and he does the music without looking at the game but he sees himself as so good that he doesn't even need to know about the game, then you have a problem, the final outcome will have plenty of flaws. Now you can't stop individuallity from showing through, and you shouldn't try. You should just try to keep people in line and working for a greater improvement of society and such.
But yea, this has went quite off topic...